 |
|
Maggot
Punk's Hate Mail Your Name:Felicia i am just like you guys in that i believe that it is wrong for people to try and force their beliefs down other's throats and that it is wrong to preach to people one's own beliefs and I hate self-righteous christians just as much as you do however, i think you all are very hypocritical and very closed minded: how can you possibly think that you are right in saying that people who believe in any god believe in fairy tales? How absolutely pompous and high and mighty can you be to try and tell people what is right and what is wrong. you are just as bad, if not worse than the people who you bad mouth on this site. I just happen to be a christian who believes in science and God at the same time (yeah, it is possible) and who is definitely pro-choice and for gay marriage, etc, and I do not go around preacing to others about what they should and should not believe. Ive seen some of your videos of you guys going out and harassing Christians, and though i dont agree with the ones who were protesting outside of the abortion clinics, i agree less with your harrassing them and then posting those videos on the internet just in order to ridicule them. If you have opinions, keep them to yourself: just because you believe something doesn't make it truth. You are no better than the Nazis who murdered millions of people for not believing what they believed. Though i am christian, i do not believe that all people who do not believe in God will go to hell; i believe that if you are a good person, regardless of your religious beliefs, you will be rewarded with eternal salvation; however, people like you who take it upon themselves to ridicule people for being different will, hopefully, be punished in hell, for you deserve nothing more than what you do to millions of people who believe differently than you, for you are all bad, heartless people (maybe heaven and hell do not exist, but either way, you ought to be punished for being bad people in general; if heaven and hell do exist, well then, i hope you enjoy your life now for there will be no enjoying life after death in hell). You can be rational and just and take what im saying and actually reflect upon it, or you can do what im sure you will do, and be narrow-minded and ignore this message, but my only purpose in writing this is to let you know that what you are doing is not making the world a better place (which im sure you believe the world wil become without religion), but instead you are creating an even greater divide between believers and non-believers. After all, if I, a loyal christian, am able to be open minded and understand where some of my friends who do not believe in god are coming from, shouldnt the people who are supposedly more morally correct than me be able to do the same? The Lord invented paragraphs for a reason. But thank you for your opinion that you think shouldn't be expressed. I'm sure millions of dead Jews and their relatives like the comparison of some poorly done videos with the mass genocide that happened in Europe. It's like you view their deaths as so trivial and that Hitler was nothing more than some guy on Youtube with a webcam.
Your
Name:terminator
Your
Name:AlabamaBeast Now don't be jealous beastie because I went to D.C. with a woman and not you.
Your
Name:Mr. Mason The
subject of human "tails" is an interesting one to say the
least. Evolutionists really enjoy bagging this claim around as evidence
for evolution. Educated evolutionists usually do not use such "evidence"
as support for their theory of origins. This is made aware when Dr.
Eugenie Scott of the National Center for Science Education was asked
about human tails on a 1999 radio debate with Dr. Hugh Ross of Reasons
To Believe. Her response follows: "Actually,
that's [human "tails"] not an evolutionary issue at all ...
It's a matter of developmental biology; it's a matter of what happens
when that sperm fertilized that egg, and that egg grew into a baby,
a nd that baby was born. I couldn't give you the exact precise biochemical
explanation but probably at some point where the genes instructing how
many vertebrae to lay down in that vertebral column du plicate d itself
a couple extra times, by mistake. It was a faulty transmission of information,
so to speak. And this particular individual just ended up getting a
few extra vertebral segments. And this doesn' t happen very frequently,
but, you know there are glitches in the genetic material that produce
things like this, just as there are glitches in the genetic material
that produce people with six fingers. But Obviously Dr. Eugenie Scott - who is a major opponent to the furthering of Creation Science - doesn't feel that "human tails" are an evolutionary issue at all. As she so clearly stated, such mutations happen that equip people with six fingers as well, but this isn't evolution. The idea of "throwbacks" is only an argument for evolution when they're convenient. For instance, if a fatty extrusion of flesh is located somewhere near an individual's lower back, it's a "tail". If a person grows a sixth finger, or an additional nipple, it's a genetic mistake. This type of flexibility barks at the credibility of the person offering such an argument. Interestingly
enough, the author of visual-evolution.com uses a picture of a Hindu
baby who reportedly is the reincarnated version of the "monkey-faced
god." I recalled seeing this picture some months back online in
an article. Is
this the best evidence for random chance evolution? If you knew what evolution was then you wouldn't have needed to respond. First off your argument that the kid won't live long has nothing to do with evolution. People born with severe birth defects often don't live long but simply being born with a tail is no indication of a short life as the article indicated the birth of humans with tails is a common phenomena and pictures were provided of people living into adulthood with them. As a matter of fact everyone is born with mutations it just happens the majority are benign. Mutations are a product of evolution, it's the primary observable indication of evolution happening. Evolution is the change in allele frequencies over time. If allele frequencies didn't change, in other words, if evolution didn't happen then we wouldn't ever see any mutations. Since we see humans born with tails and without tails that is evidence for evolution. Perhaps you ought to save your prayers and focus on doing something beneficial with your time like reading up on what evolution really is. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html#atavisms_ex2
I have to say from
listening to you talk to the people from my church and your nasty insults
directed their way that you are a very sick, demented soul needing relief
from your perverse life. I guess you had to recruit followers from a
high school to protest didn't you?
|
|
Love us or hate us, if you have to e-mail us click here. © 2002 by the Maggot Punks. No portion of this website may be reproduced without express written permission. All rights reserved. |